[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-4987. ------------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Fix Version/s: resolver-1.6.0 Committing to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk ... M resolver/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/Candidates.java M resolver/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/ResolverImpl.java M resolver/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/resolver/test/ResolverTest.java Committed r1696779 The above commit seems to fix the use cases mentioned. Could you please double check ? > Dynamic package resolution with unresolvable or fragment package exports can > lead to invalid wirings > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-4987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4987 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Resolver > Environment: All > Reporter: Thomas Watson > Assignee: Guillaume Nodet > Fix For: resolver-1.6.0 > > > With the latest code in trunk calling > org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.resolve(ResolveContext, Resource, > Requirement, List<Capability>) with a List<Capability> containing a > Capability from a fragment will lead to an invalid Wire. > This looks similar to FELIX-4897 and appears to be a regression. > There are two types of failures. > 1) Where the fragment has a valid host to resolve against. In this case I > would expect the Wire.getProvider() to be the host revision for the fragment, > but the current code returns the fragment revision > 2) Where the fragment has no valid host available. In this case I would > expect no Wire to be returned in the result from the ResolverImpl.resolve > call. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)