+1 regards,
Karl On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. This sounds like it is still worthwhile to have this release go > through. If need be I do a bug fix release as soon as this is resolved. > > regards, > > Karl > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I may be wrong, but I suspect this comes from the way Aries models its >> resources. >> If i can be provided with the necessary data and steps to reproduce the >> problem, I can investigate next week and we could delay the release until >> we have a better understanding of the issue. >> Else, I'd go ahead and publish the release... and eventually prepare for a >> bug fix release. >> >> 2015-08-26 16:27 GMT+02:00 Karl Pauls <[email protected]>: >> >> > Well, I don't think that makes much sense. If this is a serious bug >> (i.e., >> > one that is likely to be triggered in normal resolves and not just in >> some >> > subsystem scenarios) we should cancel this release and redo it when the >> bug >> > is fixed. Otherwise, we can just go ahead and the bug gets fixed and >> > released at some point in the future (as with the other pending stuff >> :-). >> > >> > My problem is that i can't judge how bad it is atm... @Guillaume, what >> are >> > your thoughts on this? >> > >> > regards, >> > >> > Karl >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:21 PM, David Bosschaert < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > To be honest, it sounds like a serious enough issue to me, but maybe >> > > we can just let this vote proceed and possibly do another release when >> > > Roman's issue is addressed? Even if this is quite soon... >> > > >> > > Just my 2c, >> > > >> > > David >> > > >> > > On 26 August 2015 at 15:14, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Hi Alexandre, >> > > > >> > > > I see you created an issue for this already which is good because I >> > don't >> > > > think the release vote is the place to discuss it. >> > > > >> > > > Having said that, I can't say how bad this issue is (i.e., whether >> we >> > > > should cancel the release or not because of it). >> > > > >> > > > Right now, I don't think we have to cancel it but I'll wait a >> little to >> > > see >> > > > if others disagree? >> > > > >> > > > regards, >> > > > >> > > > Karl >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:46 PM, ROMAN, ALEXANDRE < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> Hi, >> > > >> >> > > >> I'm having a problem with the latest versions of Felix 5.2.0, >> Resolver >> > > > 1.6.0 & Aries Subsystems 2.0.2. >> > > >> It looks like getPackageSources in ResolverImpl.java returns a null >> > > > value, causing a NPE in line 1039. >> > > >> >> > > >> org.osgi.service.subsystem.SubsystemException: >> > > > java.lang.NullPointerException >> > > >> at >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.aries.subsystem.core.internal.InstallAction.run(InstallAction.java:92) >> > > > ~[na:na] >> > > >> at >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.aries.subsystem.core.internal.InstallAction.run(InstallAction.java:30) >> > > > ~[na:na] >> > > >> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native >> Method) >> > > > ~[na:1.8.0_51] >> > > >> at >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.aries.subsystem.core.internal.BasicSubsystem.install(BasicSubsystem.java:620) >> > > > ~[na:na] >> > > >> at >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.aries.subsystem.core.internal.BasicSubsystem.install(BasicSubsystem.java:664) >> > > > ~[na:na] >> > > >> at >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.aries.subsystem.core.internal.BasicSubsystem.install(BasicSubsystem.java:263) >> > > > ~[na:na] >> > > >> ... >> > > >> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: null >> > > >> at >> > > > >> > org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.mergeUses(ResolverImpl.java:1039) >> > > > ~[org.apache.felix.framework-5.2.0.jar:na] >> > > >> at >> > > > >> > >> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.computeUses(ResolverImpl.java:854) >> > > > ~[org.apache.felix.framework-5.2.0.jar:na] >> > > >> at >> > > > >> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl.access$500(ResolverImpl.java:60) >> > > > ~[org.apache.felix.framework-5.2.0.jar:na] >> > > >> at >> > > > org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl$6.run(ResolverImpl.java:1232) >> > > > ~[org.apache.felix.framework-5.2.0.jar:na] >> > > >> at >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.felix.resolver.ResolverImpl$EnhancedExecutor$1.run(ResolverImpl.java:2419) >> > > > ~[org.apache.felix.framework-5.2.0.jar:na] >> > > >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown >> > > > Source) ~[na:1.8.0_51] >> > > >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown >> > > > Source) ~[na:1.8.0_51] >> > > >> ... 1 common frames omitted >> > > >> >> > > >> There is no error when using Resolver 1.4.0. >> > > >> >> > > >> Could you please have a look at this issue? >> > > >> Thanks. >> > > >> >> > > >> Alexandre Roman >> > > >> >> > > >> -----Original Message----- >> > > >> From: David Bosschaert [mailto:[email protected]] >> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 12:36 PM >> > > >> To: [email protected] >> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] framework 5.2.0 and related subproject releases >> > > >> >> > > >> Did some additional testing. >> > > >> Checked signatures. >> > > >> All good :) >> > > >> >> > > >> +1 from me. >> > > >> >> > > >> David >> > > >> >> > > >> On 25 August 2015 at 10:43, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > resolver 1.6.0 >> > > >> > framework 5.2.0 >> > > >> > main 5.2.0 >> > > >> > main.distribution 5.2.0 >> > > >> > >> > > >> > The main changelogs are in jira and at: >> > > >> > >> > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.resol >> > > >> > ver-1.6.0/doc/changelog.txt >> > > >> > >> > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.frame >> > > >> > work-5.2.0/doc/changelog.txt >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Staging repositories: >> > > >> > >> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1083 >> > > >> > / >> > > >> > >> > > >> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify >> the >> > > >> > signatures: >> > > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Usage: >> > > >> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1083 /tmp/felix-staging >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Please vote to approve this release: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release >> > > >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Karl Pauls >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > http://twitter.com/karlpauls >> > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls >> > > > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Karl Pauls >> > [email protected] >> > http://twitter.com/karlpauls >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls >> > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls >> > >> > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > [email protected] > http://twitter.com/karlpauls > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls > -- Karl Pauls [email protected] http://twitter.com/karlpauls http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
