[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14908096#comment-14908096
]
German Vega edited comment on FELIX-5050 at 9/25/15 2:35 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Another issue (not directly related to the bug, but that is not consistent) is
the treamtement of programmatic updates of the field (setting the property
field in a component method). Here there is also a difference be the
ConfigurationHandler and ProvidedServiceHandler :
- The ProvidedServiceHandler changes the value of the property ANDupdates the
service registration.
-The ConfigurationHandler changes the valueof the property, but DOES NOT
propagate the value to the ProvidedServiceHandler.
was (Author: gvega):
Another issue (not directly related to the bug, but ) is the treamtement of
programmatic updates of the field (setting the property field in a component
method). Here there is also a difference be the ConfigurationHandler and
ProvidedServiceHandler :
- The ProvidedServiceHandler changes the value of the property ANDupdates the
service registration.
-The ConfigurationHandler changes the valueof the property, but DOES NOT
propagate the value to the ProvidedServiceHandler.
> Reconfiguring a component with mixing configurable properties and service
> properties injected fields produces an error
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-5050
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5050
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: iPOJO
> Affects Versions: ipojo-runtime-1.12.1
> Reporter: German Vega
> Attachments: bugs.ipojo.property.reconfiguration.zip
>
>
> When a component using BOTH configurable properties and service properties is
> reconfigured, the value of the field for the service property is not
> correctly injected.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
