sigs look good, I can build the project tar.gzs. The selection of artifacts looks a bit bizarre to me. I don’t see a sources bundle for org.apache.felix.gogo.command-0.16.0 and I can’t imagine what the bin artifacts are for. Is this all intentional? I’d really prefer there be a org.apache.felix.gogo.command-0.16.0-sources.jar
thanks for undertaking this release :-) david jencks > On Oct 1, 2015, at 4:42 AM, dav...@apache.org wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm calling a vote on the following bundles: > > Felix Gogo Shell 0.12.0 > ** Improvement > * FELIX-5021 [GOGO] Use system bundle to find bundles > * FELIX-4529 [Gogo] Let gosh be configured by files contributed by > a bundle fragment > * FELIX-3341 Simple csh-like Command History > * FELIX-3340 Allow the prompt to be a Function > > ** Bug > * FELIX-4425 Short command in Gogo Shell not working with Java 8 > * FELIX-3706 gogo shell startup failure in busy system > * FELIX-3703 Race condition in gogo runtime activator > > Felix Gogo Command 0.16.0 > ** Improvement > * FELIX-5021 [GOGO] Use system bundle to find bundles > * FELIX-5009 Relative URIs would be nice for install and update > * FELIX-5008 gogo usage messages could be less confusing > * FELIX-3499 felix:cd command works only with relative paths > > ** Bug > * FELIX-4969 cd refuses to leave initial directory > > Note that not changes have been made to the Felix Gogo Runtime bundle > since the last release. > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1096 > > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the > signatures: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh > > Usage: > sh check_staged_release.sh 1096 /tmp/felix-gogo-check > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. > > Best regards, > > David Bosschaert
