Great! Thank you for the quick work. - Ray
On Apr 27, 2017 10:05 AM, "David Bosschaert" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ray, > > That import of the org.osgi.dto package is now gone. Instead it uses a > number of rules to identify classes as being a DTO or not in > DTOUtil.isDTOType(). This is because it should also support classes that > don't extend the org.osgi.dto.DTO interface but follow all the rules for > DTOs. > > Cheers, > > David > > On 26 April 2017 at 17:27, David Bosschaert <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Ray, > > > > I think the converter should not need to import it and it should not have > > a hard dependency on that package. > > > > I'll work on getting it removed. > > > > Cheers, > > > > David > > > > On 26 April 2017 at 16:22, Raymond Auge <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hey David, et al. > >> > >> Should the converter impl _substitutibly_ include the org.osgi.dto > >> package? > >> > >> Right now using converter standalone doesn't work without this package > >> somewhere on the classpath. > >> > >> -- > >> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > >> (@rotty3000) > >> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> > >> (@Liferay) > >> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> > >> (@OSGiAlliance) > >> > > > > >
