for example, for declarative service, the scr/pom.xml currently uses the
latest felix-parent (version 6)
->

    <parent>
       <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
       <artifactId>felix-parent</artifactId>
       <version>6</version>
       <relativePath />
   </parent>

and the felix-parent version 6  uses apache parent 21 (which is the latest
release):
->
    <parent>^M
       <groupId>org.apache</groupId>^M
       <artifactId>apache</artifactId>^M
       <version>21</version>^M
       <relativePath />^M
   </parent>^M

and in the apache parent 21, I see this:
->
        <plugin>^M
         <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>^M
         <artifactId>maven-gpg-plugin</artifactId>^M
         <version>1.6</version>^M
         <configuration>^M
           <gpgArguments>^M
             <arg>--digest-algo=SHA512</arg>^M
           </gpgArguments>^M
         </configuration>^M
       </plugin>^M

so, it should be at fine at least for the scr, i guess ?

cheers
pierre

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:20 PM Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
wrote:

> Perhaps you're right. Perhaps that parent is just not applied to the
> projects I've released. I'll try it next time.
>
> Thanks Carsten.
>
> - Ray
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 4:03 PM Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I thought if we use the latest Apache pom as a parent than this is
> > solved. Isn't that the case?
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> > Am 17.10.2018 um 16:45 schrieb Raymond Auge:
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > We really need to fix the build to do sha512 and remove MD5.
> > >
> > > Anyone know the magic or can point me to an example where this is
> > > configured I'd appreciate it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carsten Ziegeler
> > Adobe Research Switzerland
> > cziege...@apache.org
> >
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>  (@Liferay)
> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> (@OSGiAlliance)
>

Reply via email to