+1 from me! David
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 16:57, Raymond Auge <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > - Ray > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:54 AM David Jencks <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I think your plan will be a big improvement for now and allow for further > > rearrangement if needed. > > > > thanks! > > David Jencks > > > > > On Feb 21, 2020, at 8:27 AM, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I know i've been dragging my feet with regard to the migration to git. > > > Unfortunately, I didn't find the time until now. > > > > > > I would like to try to make some progress now and there are a couple > > > of points to consider namely, > > > > > > - our website is currently based on svn and we are using the apache > > > cms which IIUC doesn't translate directly to the gitbox support. > > > - with the ip clearance done, Tom would like to have a separate repo > > > for atomos as there are several submodules in atomos already. > > > > > > Hence, I would propose the following: > > > > > > We create two git repos called felix-dev and felix-atomos and keep the > > > current svn for the website. > > > > > > That would mean, we move all of the current svn/trunk into the new > > > felix-dev repo and put a Readme in the svn/trunk instead, pointing to > > > the two new repositories. That way, the website would still work as > > > is, the trunk would be in git, and we could give atomos a separate > > > repo. > > > > > > Effectively, that would give us 3 repos on github for now namely, > > > apache/felix (which is just a Readme pointing to the other two repos), > > > apache/felix-dev, and apache/felix-atomos. If in the future we want to > > > move out other parts of the trunk into their own repo we could do so > > > if we think it makes sense. > > > > > > I should be able to get that done next week and I'll start with it on > > > Tuesday unless somebody really is against it (in other words, I'm > > > calling for lazy consensus). > > > > > > The alternatives I see are to either create a separate repo per module > > > directly or to convert the current svn to just be the felix repo which > > > would require to rework the website with asf.yml support and not give > > > Tom a separate repo for atomos. However, in both cases, we would need > > > some volunteers as I likely don't have enough time. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Karl > > > > > > -- > > > Karl Pauls > > > [email protected] > > > > > > -- > *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> > (@Liferay) >
