OK - thanks for the info. I'll keep a watch on these things. /Bengt
Den tis 7 sep. 2021 kl 15:03 skrev Thomas Watson <tjw...@gmail.com>: > The condition specification is part of OSGi R8 Core and Compendium > releases. The OSGi R8 Core (Framework) implementation is available now > with implementations available from Felix and Equinox. The > condition factory specification is in the works but is not going to be > included with the OSGI R8 specifications ( > https://github.com/osgi/osgi/blob/design/168/.design/design-168.md). But > the declarative services specification for OSGi R8 has been updated to > include how conditions can influence service components. A release > candidate of Felix SCR 2.2.0-RC1 will be available shortly that implements > the latest OSGi R8 release candidate APIs. The final release of OSGi R8 > compendium will hopefully be released by October. All of that means that > it is not available in Karaf at this time. > > Tom > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:14 AM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Karl for your tip. > > > > Do you know which version of DS/SCR is required for using the new > condition > > specification? Is it included in Karaf? > > > > Unfortunately I don't have the possibility to help develop iPojo. I've > > helped out in a few projects before but I think iPojo is a bit over my > head > > both in skills and time. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Bengt > > > > Den tis 7 sep. 2021 kl 11:10 skrev Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I agree that iPojo is a very good component model and it will be hard > > > to replace it. I think the closest you could come to replace it with > > > would be a combination of Declarative Services (DS/SCR) and the new > > > condition specification [0] - obviously depends on what you where > > > actually doing with iPojo (for a simple @Controller it might be enough > > > to use conditions). > > > > > > That said, let me point out: there is no reason iPojo couldn't still > > > be developed - we just lack somebody to work on it for the time being. > > > If you (and/or others you know) want to continue to develop it that > > > certainly could be a way forward as well. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Karl > > > > > > > > > [0] > > > > > > http://docs.osgi.org/specification/osgi.core/8.0.0/service.condition.html#service.condition > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:39 AM Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > I have noticed that iPojo is not supported any more. That is > > unfortunate > > > > for us since we have built a lot of our functionality on iPojo. It's > > > > actually the best component model I have seen so far. > > > > > > > > We need to move on to something else then. What would you suggest? > What > > > > alternative is closest to iPojo in functionality? > > > > > > > > The big difference for us has been the @Controller annotation. With > > this > > > we > > > > have a system where we enable/disable services using configurations. > I > > > > really need some way to achieve the same but with another model than > > > iPojo. > > > > I would appreciate any suggestions. > > > > > > > > /Bengt > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Karl Pauls > > > karlpa...@gmail.com > > > > > >
