Is this the commit I should be using?

https://github.com/kwin/felix-dev/commit/93b773b29d41e625bdca52f200f8171824ad9ae9

/Bengt

Den tors 23 nov. 2023 kl 21:08 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>:

> That sounds great!
>
> Is there a release that I can download? I would really like to try it.
>
> /Bengt
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, 18:37 Александр Шаклеин, <cheester...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I have tested it with changes in suggested PR with jdk21. It works well.
>>
>> чт, 23 нояб. 2023 г., 19:08 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>:
>>
>> > I am revisiting this issue. Looking to start using iPojo in Karaf 4.4.4
>> > which supports JDK20. Did anyone create (and release) a new version of
>> > iPojo that works with JDK20? As I understood it, it was mainly about
>> using
>> > new version of ASM.
>> >
>> > /Bengt
>> >
>> > Den tis 22 mars 2022 kl 17:31 skrev Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com>:
>> >
>> > > Not sure how or by whom a new release of iPojo could be created. Does
>> > > anyone know?
>> > >
>> > > /Bengt
>> > >
>> > > Den tis 15 mars 2022 kl 17:25 skrev Bengt Rodehav (Jira) <
>> > j...@apache.org
>> > > >:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>     [
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17507040#comment-17507040
>> > >> ]
>> > >>
>> > >> Bengt Rodehav commented on FELIX-6502:
>> > >> --------------------------------------
>> > >>
>> > >> I have done some testing regarding this fix and after updating to Asm
>> > 9.2
>> > >> iPojo now works with OpenJDK 17. I would really like for a new
>> release
>> > of
>> > >> iPojo including this fix to be made.
>> > >>
>> > >> > IPOJO Java 11+ support
>> > >> > ----------------------
>> > >> >
>> > >> >                 Key: FELIX-6502
>> > >> >                 URL:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6502
>> > >> >             Project: Felix
>> > >> >          Issue Type: Improvement
>> > >> >          Components: iPOJO
>> > >> >            Reporter: Alexander Shaklein
>> > >> >            Priority: Minor
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I have made some changes in ipojo projects to work in java 11+.
>> > >> > The were successfully tested on java 11, 16. Should i make a PR or
>> i
>> > >> can work with fork alone?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
>> > >> (v8.20.1#820001)
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to