Awesum,
Clearly, this issue is a lifecycle goal. More third party services come
under the community's radar, more integrations take place. Therefore, I
foresee this on the *CN branch*.

Now Identification is not only limited to KYC and authentication. There are
usually multiple data pointers with which a client account in any Core
banking is identified with. Scores of personalised third party services
have API endpoints with which Fineract platform can consume their use case
specifics.

Categorically & unfortunately, Asewum, we don't have an Identity service. A
sustainable & stable identity service in context to Fineract as a financial
platform(and keeping up with the 2020 era) is to be able to
ascertain/verify self user or client creation as accurately as what they
claim it to be.
Example- A client creation requires their unique ID no. which can be
matched with Govt issued Database or if a client creation requires their
existing bank account access, which can be securely taken through say
Yodlee. (since there are countable such services which Fineract does not
need to keep a track of- we need to create a sequential, secure, interop
seamless framework to integrate them)

Just to avoid ambiguity, this thread is contextual to scores of third party
services where Identification is one use case. Let's call these 'Widgets'
for simplicity.

As far as the list of examples I shared, there are much more examples. The
community needs to bring this on the development roadmap.

Just to give you a fundamental challenge here- Either partners notice that
they can use few of these services and attempt to integrate or these
service provider also come forward, having noticed Fineract initiative. A
good example is Lokyata which is an external third party service for our
conversation purposes. However, their team is unable to find a definitive
seamless integration framework with Fineract platform.
This is true with other examples as well.

Now some of these 'Widgets' can be used with Fineract at the infrastructure
level, but as Fineract becomes more platformified, it will be critical to
bring these services under one seamless framework.

>
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 2:24 PM Awasum Yannick <awa...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Ankit,
>
> I am trying to understand what you are saying here. Maybe some questions
> will make me understand better.
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 10:14 AM Ankit Muellner <an...@muellners.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> At the community level, we must explore the possibility of creating a
>> seamless framework for third party services integration at both functional
>> and non functional levels:
>> 1. For both open and closed source services
>> 2. For freemium and paid services
>>
>
> Are you talking here about FIneract 1.x or Fineract CN? Fineract CN
>
>
>> The use case examples are Identification, Credit decisioning APIs,
>> Account scoring, portfolio management, USSD, SMS.
>> Past e.g Fineract has already tested the Twilio SMS API and many partners
>> deploy this.
>>
>
> Fineract 1.x and Fineract CN has basic services for Identification (do you
> mean KYC or authentication here? ). KYC, authentication is not all. Check
> out these examples use cases.
>
> Both platforms have a basic way to manage Loan Portfolios and SMS
> messaging? Are these not enough? What is your experience using them and
> some draw backs?
>
>> There are examples such as
>> *Accern API, *
>> *HID Global Identification, *
>> *Lokyata product API, *
>> *Yodlee *
>> *Plaid*
>> *Alloy*
>> *Difitek*
>>
>> This framework makes the Fineract platform more extensible with use of
>> case specific third party services and better orchestration of deployments.
>>
>>
> Are you trying to gather requirements around implementing a service that
> will allow integration with the above APIs? Which of these are more
> important to you?
>
>> Fineract does have external services integration with web hooks and
>> developers can of course explore integrations at API level for individual
>> use cases. However, a standardized framework is broadly missing to create
>> the integration workflows as simple as a non technical person using his key
>> to access these services on Fineract platform.
>>
>> Now, it is imperative that we look at tokenization, security,
>> interop feasibility of such third party services one by one, and keep
>> adding them.
>>
>
> I keep hearing that the Identity service in Fineract CN needs
> enhancements and I have no idea why? People who have seen the draw backs of
> this service, if you can please explain to some of us the problems
> currently being faced?
>

>
>
>>
>> If as a partner organisation, you have already deployed such
>> integrations, I would request your comments here.
>> Any thoughts. I can aid this thread by documenting Jira issues on
>> fineract board upon your views here.
>> --
>> Ankit Müllner
>> Muellners Europe
>> +4581929792
>>
>> This mail is governed by Muellners®  IT policy.
>> The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
>> may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
>> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
>> this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
>> the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
>> attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
>> of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
>> prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
>> monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
>> compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
>> are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
>> intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
>> to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
>>
>

-- 
Ankit Müllner
Muellners Europe
+4581929792

This mail is governed by Muellners®  IT policy.
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.

Reply via email to