I don't think there's any way you can correct it. It's working by design. The initial request responds correctly. What I think you want is; you have a particular use case for some of the self-service APIs.
If yes? You might to state that use case and ask how to achieve that without depending on the self-service APIs. Cheers On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 at 1:39 PM, Saksham Handu <academic.ra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Oluwalana for your inputs > > As per the API docs, I don't see any difference between the two. Can you > please elaborate, so that I can correct my postman request (attached in > previous mail's attachment) in a similar manner? > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 5:08 PM Oluwalana Olasubomi < > subomioluwalan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Saksham, >> >> All routes behind /self are the self service APIs built for the >> opensource android application whereas other APIs like /client was built to >> interact with your backend system. >> >> The two APIs have different authentication mechanisms that explains the >> 401. >> >> >> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 at 10:44 AM, Saksham Handu <academic.ra...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello Community, >>> >>> I'm new to Fineract API, and I was trying Fineract API from the >>> postman to get some understanding of its underlying APIs. >>> >>> I think we have an issue with */self/clients* endpoint. Refer ss 1 in >>> attachment, it was not successful. I was getting 401 >>> >>> Whereas I used */clients* endpoint, with the same Authorization Header, >>> it was a success 200. Refer to ss 2 in the attachments. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Saksham Handu >>> >> > > -- > Regards, > Saksham Handu >
