+1 On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 10:36 AM Arnold Galovics <arn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear community, > > I'd like to introduce you the idea of 3 different Fineract instance types: > - read > - write > - batch > > All 3 come with different types of restrictions in terms of what they are > capable of. For example a read instance is going to be only capable of > serving read (GET) APIs. Write APIs will be able to serve both read and > write APIs. Batch instances will be only able to serve batch job related > APIs and run the batch jobs themselves. > > This will greatly improve how we can scale Fineract in case we're planning > to deploy it to a highly-available setup with the highest-throughput > because we can scale individual parts of it. And frankly, reading data > happens much more often than actually writing data so the ability to do > this type of deployment will greatly improve what we can achieve in terms > of performance. > > Also, with the separation in place, we could utilize read-replica > databases as well where write and batch instances connect to a master DB > and the read instances connect to read-replicas therefore reducing the load > on the database as well. > > I've created a ticket for this as well: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1571 > > Hope all this makes sense and like the idea. > > Best, > Arnold >
