Agree.

As long as there is a pre-release 0.4.0-incubating, I think it is fine to
remove the earlier ones.





On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:51 AM Aleksandar Vidakovic <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> ... I'm currently doing some cleanups in our SVN repositories. For those
> who don't know: when we do releases then one part of it is handling all
> necessary tasks in Git (like creating release branches, tagging etc.), but
> we also upload the release artificats (compiled binaries and sources) as
> tar.gz files to Apache's Subversion servers (actually twice, there's a
> staging area for review and a release area for final release). Within 24h
> (more or less) a release gets automatically archived and is available at
> https://downloads.apache.org. The versions we have backed up there go
> back to version 0.4.0-incubating. On every new release we have to checkout
> these two SVN repositories (staging, release) which can be a bit annoying,
> because the artifacts stored there are quite big (several hundred MBs).
> According to the official rules (
> https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution.html#archival) we
> can/should only keep the releases that we currently support (which would be
> 1.8.4 and 1.7.3... note: to be released within 24h). I've started to remove
> the deprecated release artifacts to make the release process faster. So
> far, so good.
>
> In SVN we have a couple more release artificats that date back to our
> transition from Mifos to Apache, but were not yet archived (either, because
> the mechanics were not yet in place at Apache or because of the incubating
> status of Fineract, doesn't really matter). My question now is if we
> should/have to keep those very early release artifacts for any (nostalgic?)
> reason? Again, the archived versions go back to 0.4.0-incubating and our
> Git repository has release tags going back to version 1.0.0 (which was the
> release that made Fineract a top level project).
>
> The versions affected would be:
>
> - 0.1.0-incubating
>
> - 0.1.1-incubating
>
> - 0.1.2-incubating
>
> - 0.3.1-incubating
>
> - 0.3.2-incubating
>
>
> What do you think? Keep them or drop them? My take would be to ditch
> them...
>
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Aleks
>

Reply via email to