Dear All, My name is Venkat, and I am a recent addition to this group. I am writing to kindly request inclusion in the upcoming 1.9 call.
With a strong background in java development within the IT and investment banking sectors, I am eager to contribute my expertise to this fineract product. I completely agree with current documentation that one can start contributing. However I believe that a more in-depth understanding of the fineract architecture, existing challenges, future roadmap, areas of improvement, known issues, proper environment setup could significantly accelerate my contributions. Therefore, I am wondering if it would be possible for someone to provide a one-on-one demonstration, which would greatly enhance my grasp of the project's intricacies. I understand that schedules can be quite busy for all of you. If anyone could spare an hour for such a session, I would be immensely grateful for the opportunity to learn and contribute effectively. Thank you for considering my request. I look forward to the possibility of participating in the 1.9 call and contribute meaningfully to the fineract product . Best regards, Venkata Manthena On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 5:56 PM James Dailey <[email protected]> wrote: > Please email me directly if you’d like to be included in call. > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 8:55 AM Inzemamul Haq <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1, fine >> >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:24 PM Aleksandar Vidakovic < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1, works for me >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 5:18 PM James Dailey <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd like to propose a meeting on Monday Aug 21st at 7:30am PDT/ 4:30pm >>>> CEST / 8pm India >>>> >>>> We will update the list here once we have that meeting. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 6:03 AM Aleksandar Vidakovic <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi James, >>>>> >>>>> ... I think a meeting would make sense... if it's only to get an >>>>> overview of all the new features since 1.8 (should be a lot) and to see if >>>>> there is one or the other detail missing. >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestions when we meet? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:47 AM James Dailey <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Aleks >>>>>> >>>>>> Still trying to figure out when the release will happen. Does it >>>>>> make sense to get a group together on zoom to discuss? Or how should we >>>>>> move to a release date? >>>>>> >>>>>> James >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:47 PM Aleksandar Vidakovic <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ... looking at the PRs this sounds reasonable to me... my bet would >>>>>>> be a May time frame to tie everything up (holidays? testing?)... I can >>>>>>> do >>>>>>> both April or May if the everyone gives their green light... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Apr 2023, 20:08 James Dailey, <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Aleks - what should we say about planned release 1.9 in our Board >>>>>>>> report? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently I have written "Planned release April - May 2023". Is >>>>>>>> that accurate do you think? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> James Dailey >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile >>>>>> >>>>> -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile >
