+1
From: Avik Ganguly<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, 07 January 2024 16:05 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos -1 binding All repos should not be archived (Ex:- accounting, template, provisioner). Regression across modules, flaky integration tests, difficult to refactor code are consequences of the architecture and current architecture is not a long term sustainable solution. New modules like overdraft/buy now pay later or scalable savings/current/checking accounts should not be built in Fineract just because of maturity of reporting module, UI components and other similar reasoning. On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Dailey <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 binding (Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes) On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 binding On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <[email protected]> wrote: +1 binding On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 binding On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w the Fineract-CN project? discussion was held on list in December. Vote +1 , -1, or 0 Members of PMC indicate as binding
