Hi community -  Recently, Felix was re-writing the README.  He proposed a
different description.

Note that the official ASF listed description is:

The mission of Apache Fineract is the creation and maintenance of software
related to a core banking platform that provides a reliable, robust, and
affordable solution for entrepreneurs, financial institutions, and service
providers to offer financial services to the world's underbanked and
unbanked.


That change of mission was already discussed so, I think, we should simply
use that:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/556hwmw9xs05x17nc6db0mjf9ontdvto

We changed the description in Oct 2022
https://lists.apache.org/thread/556hwmw9xs05x17nc6db0mjf9ontdvto

As a matter of best practice, the README should have been changed to
reflect that change, but wasn't.

I am ok with Felix's new description:   Any supporters?


> *Apache Fineract is an open-source core banking platform providing a *
> *flexible, extensible foundation for a wide range of financial services. *
> *By making robust banking technology openly available, it lowers barriers *
> *for smaller institutions and innovators to reach underserved and
> unbanked **populations.*


Felix wrote

1. In particular in light of recent discussions on the mailing list, the
current description of the Fineract project at the top is imprecise:

 > Apache Fineract: A Platform for Microfinance
 > Fineract is a mature platform with open APIs that provides a
reliable, robust, and affordable core banking solution for financial
institutions offering services to the world’s 3 billion underbanked and
unbanked.

I suggest the following instead:

 > Apache Fineract: Fintech for everyone
 > Apache Fineract is an open-source core banking platform providing a
flexible, extensible foundation for a wide range of financial services.
By making robust banking technology openly available, it lowers barriers
for smaller institutions and innovators to reach underserved and unbanked
populations.

This reflects better the reality. But due to the significance of this
change, I would like to hear your opinion first.

Reply via email to