On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:15 AM James Dailey <[email protected]> wrote:

> Your help in adjusting it as you suggested would be appreciated.
>

Awesome, yep, that's why I'm here and I'm happy to help.

We want to make sure that future development is done on the main develop
> branch here, not on outside forks as we have seen many times.
>

Awesome, thanks for making sure these docs came home.

I believe that adequate and accurate documentation is a must have and
> should be part of any definition of done.
>

Agreed. Be sure to look for maintenance of existing
code/tests/documentation with these kinds of changes, too. The new docs on
e2e and integration testing from PR 5067 are great, but they duplicate and
at times conflict with other test/build docs. (side note: My favorite PRs
delete more lines than they add)

You should probably make sure that your comments get to the dev
> specifically who made the documentation PR.
>

Yep, well... and I'm not complaining here, but yeah, not my first rodeo.
This is the 3rd place I've asked for help with this.

first was
https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/5067#issuecomment-3423007520 (generally
triggers a notification to authors/reviewers/committers unless that is
disabled)

second was https://mifos.slack.com/archives/C028634A61L/p1760981237978299
(might
notify? I don't usually count on it though)

So I'm guessing the original authors/committers aren't active/watching
those places nor here, or are too busy, or 100 other reasons. That's OK.

No worries, really! I'll get help / figure it out eventually. And again,
I'm not complaining, I'm just sharing what I've done so far and I welcome
feedback on my process here.

Reply via email to