Mohammed Are you a GSOC candidate for Fineract? If so, please see our several emails in recent days.
Sent from Gmail Mobile On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 3:07 AM Mohammed Saifulhuq < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Following up on the Transaction Idempotency POC. Based on feedback from > Aleks on the ticket, we are pivoting away from patching individual modules > and moving towards a system-wide, generic interceptor approach aligned with > FINERACT-2169 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2169>. > > I have just posted the revised technical architecture on the Jira ticket: > FINERACT-2485 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FINERACT/issues/FINERACT-2485?filter=allissues&orderby=level+ASC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+updated+DESC> > > The proposed mechanics involve a Spring OncePerRequestFilter and a > dedicated DB table for atomic locking via unique constraints. > > I am starting the implementation now but would appreciate any immediate > red flags regarding the database constraint approach for the atomic lock. > > Best, Mohammed Saifulhuq >
