After reading the discussion and from my own experience with this issue, I also believe that Postgres is a good idea.
+1 Non binding On Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 2:28 PM Deepak Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 Non-binding contributor > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 at 12:27 AM, KRISHNA MEWARA < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 Non-binding >> >> On Mon, 23 Mar, 2026, 00:12 Aira Jena, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Non-binding contributor +1 >>> benefits of PostgreSQL are clear enough and will reduce overload after >>> standardizing also the right call for the project’s maintainability. >>> >>> On 2026/03/22 15:50:25 Adam Monsen wrote: >>> > I'd like to call a vote on simplifying Fineract database support to >>> > Postgres only. >>> > >>> > Please review FSIP-9 >>> > < >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/FSIP-9%3A+Standardize+on+PostgreSQL >>> > >>> > and cast your vote. >>> > >>> > This vote closes in 72 hours. >>> > >>> > Voting process <https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html> reminders >>> > (thank you Terence Monteiro >>> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/mw1jvz0695jbj1oo4d2xkyccdhot8jcq>): >>> > >>> > /PMC members: Binding votes (+1/-1) >>> > Committers: Non-binding votes welcome and valued >>> > Community members: Non-binding votes also welcome - your review >>> > helps strengthen our releases >>> > >>> > Even non-binding votes are important contributions that demonstrate >>> > the participatory nature of the Apache Way and help validate our >>> > release quality. Every review adds confidence to our release process./ >>> > >>> > This is a code modification, so I'll assume consensus approval when >>> > counting votes. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Adam Monsen >>> > Software Engineer » Mifos Initiative >>> > Release Manager » Apache Fineract >>> > Author » Steadfast Self-Hosting >>> > PGP key » 0xA9A14F22F57DA182 >>> > >>> >> -- Edward E. Kang [email protected] 972-768-6940
