Hi,

... not sure about the development part... there are a ton of Gradle
plugins out there that do this, so wouldn't advise to put something
together yourself; I think that would be wasted effort for an already
solved problem... e.g. this one comes to mind
https://github.com/jk1/Gradle-License-Report... technically I think we are
required to list all licenses of all artifacts we use somewhere (I think
the NOTICE file is usually the place if I'm not mistaken, maybe could be
LICENSE).

On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 8:23 AM Aman Mittal <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I like to propose adding a CI check for Category X transitive dependencies
> for Fineract.
>
> At present, there is no check in the build that catches this. A Category X
> license could be introduced transitively through an otherwise unrelated
> dependency bump and remain unnoticed until a release audit. Or even direct
> dependency license changes  [One example i recall is at the time of
> liquibase where they changes their license on the new release] and sometime
> needs manual reviews
>
> What's already in place, and why it doesn't cover this:
>
> - Apache RAT (./gradlew rat) already runs in CI, but RAT checks whether
> our own source files have the correct Apache license headers. It does not
> audit dependency licenses, including transitive dependencies, so it is
> not a substitute for dependency license compliance checking.
>
> - CycloneDX is already applied at the root of build.gradle and generates a
> complete SBOM. However, nothing currently consumes the SBOM to enforce
> license policy.
>
> This would involve generating an SBOM for the `develop` branch and for the
> PR head, then comparing the changes to flag any dependency using a license
> that requires review. [This will also keep the existing dependencies as it
> is but will flag for new changes]
>
> I'd like to gather feedback and reach consensus on the approach before
> starting implementation. Please share your thoughts, concerns, or
> objections.
>
> Once there is rough agreement, I'll follow up with a JIRA ticket to track
> the implementation.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Aman
>

Reply via email to