Hi, Personally I recommend to not considering command framework for upcoming gsoc unless any committer actually wants to mentor this. And some ongoing PRs are still yet to merge. (It also affect the core fineract so we will be very careful in this one) Any core fineract idea must have PMC approval and dedicated committer as mentor.
You can consider other fineract side projects. Regards Aman On Thu, 5 Nov, 2026, 6:22 pm Ádám Sághy, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > The real reason why the new command framework is not targeting these > endpoints are the missing capabilities which are not addressed yet: > > - idempotency handling > - maker-checker > - etc > > > Regards, > Adam S > > On Nov 5, 2026, at 12:28 PM, Abhishek Chaudhary < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > While looking at Savings for GSoC 2027 ideas, I noticed that the 2026 GSoC > page excluded the loan and savings packages from the command-processing > project "to prevent interference with Pepper Soup efforts": > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/FINERACT/pages/421958555/GSOC+Summer+2026 > > While searching on "what pepper soup is" (I thaught it was a phrase), I > stumbled on 2024 Mifos post ( > https://mifos.org/blog/pepper-soup-enhancements/) and got to know Pepper > Soup as sponsored upstream work focused mainly on loans, COB and > performance. > > I had two questions: > 1. Is that work still ongoing, and does its current scope include Savings, > for example the Savings COB work in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2332? > 2. Would stability work on Savings interest posting, such as tests and bug > fixes, be open to a GSoC 2027 project, or should GSoC stay clear of that > area? > > Thanks, > Abhishek > > >
