> On Nov 28, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Myrle Krantz <mkra...@mifos.org> wrote: >> Hi Mentors, >> >> As you know Apache Fineract has a UI project which Mifos did not donate to >> the ASF because it's not licensable in the way the ASF requires. This has >> been a major communication challenge. We've split the communication across >> two lists, even though newbies don't understand the difference between the >> UI and the backend code, and even though many discussions impact both. >> >> At the ApacheCon I was asked if we have any volunteer opportunites for >> non-techies. Mifos does, and among those are translations or documentation >> which are definitely more prevalent in the UI. >> >> So here's the question (s): Is there any objection to us creating tickets >> for non-Apache code in the Apache's Jira, or moving documentation of the UI >> to Apache's Confluence? Is there any reason we should be careful about >> having discussions about the UI on the Apache mailing list? >> >> Because if we could move these kinds of communications into one channel, >> instead of the two it currently is split between, it might help alleviate >> some of the confusion... > > Since what gets developed at ASF is basically the engine -- I'd assume that > multiple different UIs would be possible. Hence it seems to me that a more > natural relationship would be the other way around: folks working on Mifos > point at ASF JIRA, etc. Btw, does Mifos have a publicly available, developer > friendly tracker and wiki infrastructure?
+1
