Re: [3/3] git commit: license is added by maven build, no need of this file

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

I'd actually leave the LICENSE in the repo, while it obvious that an Apache 
project is licensed under an Apache license, people can browse the source code 
in other ways (eg github mirrror) and IMO it's good to be clear about how the 
code is licensed.

Thanks,
Justin