Also, the Closure Compiler has plenty of configuration options (not in
the least the level of optimisation). The various output types might
want/need to make their calls differently. The solution we're looking
for should take that into account, if possible.

EdB



On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Michael Schmalle
<[email protected]> wrote:
> If you view a discussion started by Roland and commented on by myself, you
> will see that configuration is what we are after and FLEXC compiler will
> answer this question.
>
> Yeah, I know... head in the clouds, but this is the EXACT reason we are
> going to do what we were talking about with a modular compiler. It's
> ridiculous to even ask this question and then go implement it in 3 different
> compilers.
>
> Mike
>
>
> Quoting Alex Harui <[email protected]>:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/29/13 10:06 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree that building everything in one command should be the goal. I
>>> do not think that HTML should be part of the compiler. Isn't there a
>>> way to wrap both the compile step and the HTML generation into one
>>> script, like I did in ant with the publisher, but maybe in an extended
>>> version of MXMLC?
>>
>> Yes, but then you have to duplicate the parsing of the MXML file to
>> determine things like app dimensions that go in the templates.
>>
>> I'm not fond of having ANT be a requirement.  For shell scripts, I might
>> be
>> able to use sed/awk but I don't know how to do that on Windows, and I
>> don't
>> want to make Cygwin a requirement either.
>>
>> Maybe I'll play around with a java app that calls MXMLC and can get back
>> the
>> information it needs and then updates the wrappers.
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Reply via email to