I am sorry, it is a bit confusing which 1 you are voting for. My bad for re-using numbers in a nested way. Can you be specific and vote for 3.1, etc. if you mean the options under 3?
Thanks, Om On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com> wrote: > +1 for #1. Be good to figure out merge/conflict early in the game. > > Peter Ent > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems > > On 3/20/13 4:25 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >On 3/20/13 12:26 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Here is my proposal in the meantime: > >> > >> 1. We open up Falcon and ASJS repos first since there are no issues > >>with > >> that > >+1. Peter and I probably have merge conflicts in ASJS which would be a > >good > >testing ground since there isn't critical history in there. > >> 2. I have pinged Infra about the missing history in Utilities. Let > >>them > >> come back to us with a definitive answer. > >+0. That's fine, but to me, it isn't worth the wait. Let's open it up > >too. > >> 3. We need to figure out what to do about the whiteboard. The current > >> proposals to fix this problem are: > >> > >> 1. Use the sparse checkout option as described here > >> http://markmail.org/message/dg7hplezkzwiroes) > >> 2. Create a branch per user in the whiteboard > >> 3. Move to github for whiteboards > >> 4. Let whiteboards remain in SVN > >> > >I vote for #3 (isn't #1 dependent on #3?). IIRC, it wasn't horribly slow > >for Fred the second time he tried it. The 240MB in there isn't the > >biggest > >download I've seen. I think FB was larger. > > > >-- > >Alex Harui > >Flex SDK Team > >Adobe Systems, Inc. > >http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > >
