We just disagree. How shall we proceed?
In what do you disagree, in what I'm technically stating or the fact I thing
is better to have a clean, linear and readable history for the cost of not
even an extra step if they follow the guideline ?
I can create a simulation with 1 bare repo and 2 clones to demonstrate my
point if needed ?
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Michael A. Labriola
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:15 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment
Yes, only if there's nothing to merge, as soon as the remote HEAD is ahead
of my branch HEAD, I'll have an extra merge commit I don't want in order to
keep a clean, linear and readable history.
We just disagree. How shall we proceed?
