A unix diff of the flex-external repo reports no errors. It can be opened for read-write.
On 3/29/13 12:02 AM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The flex-utilities git repo is now read/write. It is available here: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-utilities.git > > Also, https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-external.git is up for > review. Alex, if you can get this reviewed, I will go ahead and ask them > to open it up for read/write. > > Thanks, > Om > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Jose Barragan < > jose.barra...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> -- >> Jose Barragan >> Chief Software Architect >> Codeoscopic Madrid >> C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92. >> Planta 5. 505. >> 28020 Madrid. >> Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80 >> >> On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> 2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>> >>>> +1 too >>>> >>>> -Fred >>>> >>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Erik de Bruin >>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> EdB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yup, let's get it done. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the >>>>>> flex-utilities >>>>>> git repo. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any >>>>>> objections? >>>>>> >>>>>> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we >> would >>>>>> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and >> I >>>>>> am >>>>>> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Om >>>>>> >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549: >>>>>> ------------------------------**------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Okay folks: >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same >>>>>> result. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn >>>>>> handle >>>>>> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to >> specify >>>>>> a >>>>>> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree) >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], >> which >>>>>> is >>>>>> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of >>>>>> the >>>>>> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout >>>>>> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history. >>>>>> >>>>>> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many >> thanks >>>>>> for that.) >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know how you want to proceed with this. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**view=revision&revision=1373617< >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617> >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alex Harui >>>>> Flex SDK Team >>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>> >>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>> >>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Carlos Rovira >>> Director de Tecnología >>> M: +34 607 22 60 05 >>> F: +34 912 94 80 80 >>> http://www.codeoscopic.com >>> http://www.directwriter.es >>> http://www.avant2.es >> >> -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui