>Just to double check: The sources on >https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit are the most up-to-date?
Yes, those are the most current.... now getting back into this, we do have a bit of complexity. Sorry, its been a while since I thought about this. Right now the version in git references the FlexUnit .9 swc and the hamcrest.swc. Adobe hasn't donated FlexUnit .9 so we really can't just include that and although there was talk of moving hamcrest here, that hasn't happened. A long while ago, I made a version that removed these dependencies. We probably need to move that branch as our master.... however, that brings up a larger question. If we move the entire repo, then that would mean there is a copy of both of these binaries in the history of the repo.... are we violating anything by doing this? Mike
