+1 Non-binding. Let me know when it gets donated. I have some forked code that allows you to also use Swiz in a Pure AS3 project, which may be desirable for some.
Nick On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Greg Reddin <gred...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > After proposal thread (http://markmail.org/message/jtedmmx5djqen52l > ),comes > > the vote thread. > > > > This thread is to decide if we finally adopt Swiz Framework under Apache > > Flex, since there is multiple opinions in the Apache Flex community. > > > > points to take into account: > > > > * Swiz is a great addition to Apache Flex since it complements de SDK > with > > a microarquitecture for application MVC, IOC, DI very simple and well > > designed. > > * This will be a project like flexunit or utilities. So it's optional a > NOT > > part of the main sdk. > > * Swiz is already in 1.4.0 stable version, under Apache License 2.0, has > > its community and right now there's no maintenance or upgrade since > people > > behind the project is no longer working with Flex technology. > > * Donation will be 1.4.0 source code and wiki content. > > * Future plans: if donation is successful, Chris Scott (creator of Swiz) > > will want to donate experimental 2.0.0 branch that brings AOP support, a > > feature that could bring a great benefit to Apache Flex since it brings > > something very new to client web technologies and that will require > > evolution at compiler level (introducing compile time weaving). > > > > Points that some people argument to not accept the donation: > > * There is other frameworks like Swiz out there in the same situation and > > this donation could make Swiz the preferred/recommended IOC framework of > > use. > > > > Points to take into account: > > * Erik de bruin stated that maybe the problem is "what to do with it" > under > > Apache Flex umbrella. > > > > > > Please make your vote. > > > > Thanks > > > > Carlos Rovira > > >
