OK, got what I needed. On 6/2/13 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>Hey, can I log in again? It looks like there are some tests that didn't >have a win-specific bitmap and I want to see if there is a bad.png.xml for >them. > >-Alex > >On 6/2/13 10:32 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>> So, the metric for success may require that script that checks for >>> failures.txt and runs with the -failures options. >> >>Ok, that script is ready to go in 'jenkins.sh', it's commented out on >>the bottom of the file. >> >>> But the interesting thing for me once we get this Jenkins thing running >>> is: if several committers also set up this same Jenkins job, could we >>>have >>> them each run a subset of the mustella tests and report much sooner? I >>> think it was you who suggested we could create a massively parallel >>> mustella system. >> >>If only I was such a creative thinker. I won't take credit for that >>idea as I don't have a clue where to start, even ;-) >> >>EdB >> >> >> >>-- >>Ix Multimedia Software >> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>3521 VB Utrecht >> >>T. 06-51952295 >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
