The file downloads fine. The new jar does the trick, I get a nice, clean new project, no errors.
Thanks! EdB On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > OK, I think I've fixed the permissions. Let me know if you have a problem > using it. > > -Alex > > On 7/30/13 12:23 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>OK, my bad on the folder name. Updated the readme. >> >>Anybody know what permission I would have to change to allow the jar to be >>downloaded? >> >> >>On 7/29/13 11:57 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >>>Same here: >>> >>>Permission error on the download and the FB 4.7 location seems to be >>>"eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722" >>> >>>??? >>> >>>EdB >>> >>> >>> >>>On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:50 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Same here. Getting a "*Server Problem**Unknown server error.* Try >>>>again or >>>> contact the server administrator." >>>> >>>> Also, the folder in my FB installation >>>> is eclipse\plugins\com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722 >>>> >>>> This is on Windows 7, FB 4.7 64-bit >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Om >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Swen van Zanten <f...@hdsign.nl> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have tried downloading the file.. but the browser says I have no >>>>> permission.. >>>>> Also in your readme the folder that is pointed to is: >>>>> eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flash.codemodel_4.7.0.349722 >>>>> But on my machine it is: >>>>> eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722 >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> SWEN VAN ZANTEN >>>>> Hoofdstraat 160 >>>>> 2171 BL, Sassenheim >>>>> >>>>> Op 30 jul. 2013, om 08:04 heeft Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> het >>>>> volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>> > Even later update on the "New Project" issue: >>>>> > >>>>> > I think I have successfully patched a jar in FlashBuilder to get >>>>>around >>>>> > this problem. >>>>> > >>>>> > The patched jar and a readme is up on >>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlashBuilder/ >>>>> > >>>>> > Can a few folks try it so we know it works? I think it will only >>>>>work >>>>> > with FlashBuilder 4.7 (and not 4.6). Then we'll discuss what to do >>>>>next. >>>>> > >>>>> > -Alex >>>>> > >>>>> > On 7/29/13 5:45 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> Latest update on the "New Project" issue: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I think I've found the offending code for real this time. There is >>>>>code >>>>> >> for a version check that checks that the Flex version is less than >>>>>5.0.0 >>>>> >> by doing: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> major * 100 + minor * 10 + micro >>>>> >> >>>>> >> This means that we don't have the option to change to Apache Flex >>>>>5.0.0 >>>>> to >>>>> >> get around this problem, and further means that someday when we >>>>>really >>>>> >> mean to do 5.0 we'll have this problem again. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> There is a class called MXMLVersion2009.java that creates an >>>>>instance of >>>>> >> org.osgi.Framework.Version like this: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> init(..., ..., >>>>> >> new Version(4,5,0), new Version(5,0,0), new >>>>>Version(4,0,0)); >>>>> >> >>>>> >> It looks like the expectation was that these versions would get >>>>>updated >>>>> >> when FB had synchronized releases with Adobe Flex SDKs. We need to >>>>>go >>>>> in >>>>> >> an change that 5 to something larger somehow. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I am passing the same information on to the FB team at Adobe. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -Alex >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On 7/29/13 7:46 AM, "Scott Guthmann" <sc...@on3solutions.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>> I am hoping we're going to release something other than RC3 which >>>>> means >>>>> >>>> we have a few more days before we would release. Here's my >>>>>latest >>>>> >>>> update on the 3 issues: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> 1) ResourceModule via FlashVars: Yes it affects a small >>>>>population of >>>>> >>>> the total Flex SWFs in the world, but at least two of folks who >>>>>took >>>>> the >>>>> >>>> time to try the RC found it. I have a fix ready to go. >>>>> >>>> 2) This FB Issue. I am trying to get a response from the FB >>>>>team. >>>>> And >>>>> >>>> I'm looking through their source to try to find the actual cause. >>>>> If >>>>> we >>>>> >>>> cut another RC, we should at minimum update the release notes in >>>>>the >>>>> >>>>> kits themselves to describe this issue and its workaround. But >>>>>maybe >>>>> >>>>> by the time we get the next RC ready we'll have more >>>>>information. >>>>> >>>> 3) The Ilist issue. The bug author's workaround was to stop >>>>>using >>>>> >>>> DataList. Not everyone has the luxury of doing that, so IMO, we >>>>> really >>>>> >>>> don't have a workaround. And this will affect LCDS customers. I >>>>> think >>>>> >>>> we >should revert the change to Ilist, but we don't have to >>>>>revert the >>>>> >>>> change to ListCollectionView. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> So, I would prefer we cut another RC at least to address #1 and >>>>>#3, >>>>> and >>>>> >>>> maybe we'll come up with a better plan for #2 during that time. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> -Alex >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> To release or not to release - that is the question.... >>>>> >>> +1 to Alex's approach. Strategically, it is better to release >>>>>something >>>>> >>> that provides developers with a good user experience. Releasing >>>>> something >>>>> >>> that requires deletion of files to work right or a patch to >>>>>several of >>>>> >>> the IDEs that are standard is a bad idea. Some of the goals we >>>>>should >>>>> >>> have when we test to determine if the RC should move forward: 1) >>>>>Does >>>>> the >>>>> >>> SDK RC work smoothly on mac, windows, and Linux? 2) Does the AIR >>>>> >>> installer work smoothly on mac, windows, and linux? 3) do the >>>>>binary >>>>> >>> distributions work smoothly on each of these platforms? 4) Are the >>>>> manual >>>>> >>> builds of the SDK and the binary versions supported by the top >>>>>IDEs: >>>>> >>> IntelliJ, Flash Builder, Flash Develop, and FDT? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> My opinion is that we are not adequately evaluating if the RC >>>>>versions >>>>> >>> are meeting these developer user experience questions when voting >>>>>on an >>>>> >>> them. The community millions of devs are not as capable of the >>>>> patching & >>>>> >>> work arounds as you guys are. The best marketing you can do is >>>>> creating a >>>>> >>> feature rich product that is easy to use for any skill level - >>>>>make it >>>>> >>> simple (which is difficult to do). >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Ix Multimedia Software >>> >>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>3521 VB Utrecht >>> >>>T. 06-51952295 >>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
