It wasn't "official marketing" or buggy code. The problem was the non-official marketing. I.e. , Adobe's CEO and other decision makers deciding to abandon Flash and to give mixed messages to companies as to whether or not it would continue to be supported and how.
They would rather people buy their products for a solution that doesn't always work, rather than support a working system that they believe will no longer be needed once their new products become popular enough. brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47 On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 2:15 PM, bryan hunt <sentimental.br...@gmail.com>wrote: > Release notes == plain text > > Reason for loss of Flash/Flex market share, not marketing, because > there was plenty of that - messy, inconsistent, amateur platform, > tools, and buggy runtime. > > Has anyone in Adobe middle management every actually worked as a > developer, or is that something they look down on? >
