See, told you I'm out of my area ;-) On 10/29/13 10:54 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/29/13 1:29 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" >> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >> >> >Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is >>in >> >contrast to the "public-repo" idea. But I would still prefer to have >>the >> >fdk deployed somewhere reliable. I know in our Business things Change >> >quite fast I wouldn't have immagined giving up my Consultant life and >> >having a full employment doing GWT stuff one year ago. But things have >> >changed, dramatically reducing the amount of time I have to develop the >> >next Flex Maven plugin (Sorry for that). I just want to prevent that >>one >> >day a posting Comes to this list, that the repo is offline because of >> >whatsoever reasons. As Sonatype is running Maven Central I doubt that >> >they will go out of Business soon, so for me it's currently the most >> >reliable place in Addition to the fact that it should work with any >>Maven >> >Installation out of the box. >> >> Again, I'm out of my area of knowledge here, but is Sonatype's future >> existence that much better guaranteed? Isn't there some repo on Apache >> hardware where the Apache Flex bits should live? Adobe did offer to >>place >> pom.xml files next to its downloads and I expect there to be Flash >> downloads available for a long time, probably "forever". >> >> >+1 to having the artifacts under Apache or Apache Flex control. But, >http://repo.maven.apache.org/ redirects to >http://search.maven.org/#browsewhich is run by Sonatype. The docs on >Apache Maven recommends artifacts to >be uploaded to the Central Repository. [1] > >Thanks, >Om > >[1] >http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html > > >> -Alex >> >>
