The question here is whether Alex should state that he is in fact continuing as the Chair in the board report. I don't see any controversy in that. Or do folks think that it is not necessary?
Thanks, Om On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > Alex: "... whether I should continue if I'm willing to do so (which I am)." > > Seems like a clear statement to me. > > EdB > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > IMO he's not clearly stated that he will stand for another year and yes > the choice is his. The board report seems to me to be a good place to state > that. When putting the guidelines together consensus was that the chair > should be for a year or reviewed every year. There may be other PMC members > who would also like to have a turn at being the chair. > > > > There does seem some support for changing the chair (see the other > discuss thread on that) but there's certainly not a consensus either way, > up to Alex to consider and decide. Again I think everyone can agree he's > done a good job and will continue to do so, but it may also be good to > change and spread the experience about. > > > > Looking back to when Alex was voted in it was pointed out by the mentors > that there should of been more discussion on who should be chair. [1] Now > seems a good time to have that discussion. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > > 1. http://markmail.org/message/3cljrqmwfipsq7zn > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
