Great news Peter,
On Dec 6, 2013 11:42 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've just finished an experiment with pretty good results.
>
> A little while ago I created a first pass at a FlexJS DataGrid. This meant
> building both the ActionScript and the JavaScript components and all of
> their parts (data model, view, and so forth). Creating a new component for
> FlexJS follows the same pattern: build the component in one language and
> then build it in the other.
>
> The experiment was to take the ActionScript component and compile it into
> JavaScript and compare the result with my hand-crafted JavaScript version.
> Well, the result was a success. Doing this uncovered some issues with the
> FalconJX compiler that were resolved by either Alex Harui or Erik de Bruin,
> which I think, strengthened the compiler. Once things were ironed out, the
> ActionScript DataGrid compiled cleanly into JavaScript and ran.
>
> This experiment worked for the DataGrid because it is really a composite
> component. That is, the DataGrid I created is a Container with a ButtonBar
> for column headers and Lists for the columns; the DataGrid co-ordinates the
> events between all of the lists. This technique would not work for
> components that have very custom JavaScript requirements or which have
> "native" JavaScript/HTML versions (such a Label or a Button).
>
> What this experiment means is that some components - specifically ones
> that are composed of existing components - can be created and tested in
> ActionScript, then cross-compiled into JavaScript to provide a fast-path to
> the JavaScript version. This technique may not work 100% in all cases, but
> what it has shown me is that you can get a lot of good code on the
> JavaScript side from the ActionScript source, at least enough to quickly
> finish the JavaScript version.
>
> Regards,
> Peter Ent
> Adobe Systems
>

Reply via email to