Comments / rating is rather usual feature in sites that list submitted things (apps, themes, ...) .
But as you said, managing the comments / rating would require more infrastructure (DB, real server back-end, etc...) plus the spamming thing to control. So probably not feasible... Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:19 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: Flex showcase I'd rather not get into the comments / rating thing. *.apache.org is a pretty huge target for spammers and we shouoldn't have to make it somebody's full time job to scrape all those -- esp. if they are tied to some business which may then want to leave the showcase because of negative or spammy comments. Plus the whole DB thing. I'm in support of a Flex app pulling in a static XML document that would be easy to update. On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Maurice Amsellem < [email protected]> wrote: > >But it does bring up the point of how we are going to organize the > >page > someday to handle large amounts of entries. > - Maybe the showcase itself could be a Flex app, with tags, > ranking/votes , comments, etc... > - we could split in mobile / desktop > > (just ideas) > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 11:46 À : [email protected] Objet > : RE: Flex showcase > > "Maybe when we have a few dozen entries, we can start being > restrictive ;-)" > > That sounds like a nice problem to have :). But it does bring up the > point of how we are going to organize the page someday to handle large > amounts of entries. > > > -Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 2:48 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Flex showcase > > > Do we really need to make that distinction? It would be better if > > we dont too many restrictions on apps we want to showcase. > > Maybe when we have a few dozen entries, we can start being restrictive > ;-) > > Maurice >
