> >Looks like it creating a method/closure to call for the catch block and >doesn't if there an empty catch block. > >Scout far shows less memory used for the empty catch block. eg 10,000 >closures created for tryCatch and none for emptyTryCatch. Also 37 ms for >tryCatch and 1ms for emptyTryCatch. Most of the time spent is in garbage >collection. Interesting. I'll have to take a look at the byte code someday. Thanks for the info.
-Alex
