One reason we want to release FlexJS with a major version number is that we can announce it via an ASF press release.
Remember that they do that only for major releases and not dot releases. We dont want to miss all the press coverage. Thanks, Om On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 2/10/14 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" when >> >FlexJS is selected. >> In the skin, "Apache Flex" appears to be a bitmap. I don't know what font >> we used, etc. If you can generate new bitmaps for FlexJS and maybe >> Falcon/FalconJX that would be great. >> >> > We have the fonts, I have photoshop ;-) Will get it done. > > >> > >> >More importantly, I think the first version of FlexJS should be 1.0 and >> >4.0.1. >> >I dont know where 4.0.1 comes from? What is the reasoning? Perhaps we >> >need a poll for that? >> The reasoning is that Flash Builder won't handle version numbers below 4. >> > > Ah, I forgot about Flash Builder and its idiosyncrasies. No way FB could > push out a patch for this? > > >> It might be possible that Flash Builder only reads the version from >> flex-sdk-description.xml and we can use 0.0.1 in the package names, but I >> don't know if that would be even more confusing when you go to install the >> SDK in FB. Someone suggested starting FlexJS with version 5, but that >> > might need testing. It would be great if someone could help out and try >> various permutations. >> > > What if the name of the software is "FlexJS 1.0" with 4.x in the > flex-sdk-description.xml. Would that be acceptable? > > > >> >> -Alex >> >> >
