Sorry, wasn't clear. Thanks for reminding me that FXG is a class linked into the SWF and referenced as a class by the AS code. On the JS side, do we want that FXG class to be a "class" (its own JS file that loads or has SVG data in it)? Or is more "conversion" needed.
On the JS side, is there is a way to embed SVG data in an HTML page? -Alex On 2/26/14 12:59 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 2/26/14 12:42 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>3. Falcon should be able to compile FXG now, but I think it will use >> >>Spark >> >> components like Group. The compiler either needs to output different >> >> primitives or we need to fake up lighter weight Spark components. >>I'd >> >> strongly prefer the first option. >> >> >> > >> >I think I understand. Can we break this up into a very simple use case >> >and >> >see which direction we want to go? I may need a bit of hand holding on >> >this one. >> >> Was FXG always embedded? >> >> >You can also instantiate it just like a component in MXML. If you embed >it, the compiler seems to rasterize it and you will lose the scaling, etc. >properties that makes vectors so attractive. > > >> Is there a way to "embed" SVG? >> > >Yes, just like an image: > >[Embed(source="logo.svg")] >[Bindable] >public var imgCls:Class; > >Adobe had deprecated it. But, at Apache Flex, we un-deprecated it a while >ago. > >Thanks, >Om > > >> >> Anyway, yes a simple test case would help us find the desired workflow >>and >> fix what is needed. >> >> -Alex >> >>
