Hi, > That's being a bit to literal with the rules, IMO. It would be nonsense to > release source that doesn't do anything useful - or worse, throw exceptions > all over the place - upon compilation.
JFYI just doing "ant" will make something useful that you can use. > As I did get a successful compilation, and at some point managed to get a > successful 'ant package' build, I'm changing my vote to +1. Thanks much appreciated and the next release will address the issues you raised Justin
