I'm currently working on using Falcon in Flexmojos for compiling normal applications ... so this assumption is valid :-)
Chris ________________________________________ Von: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> Gesendet: Montag, 14. April 2014 06:34 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC1 Hi, > I think compiler/commandline isn't intended to work from that folder. It > gets copied into the "SDK". Even if it does It will still have the newline issue and this should be pointed out in the README or RELEASE_NOTES. I certainly expected them to work. > It's a good question as to how "self-sufficient" this kit needs to be when > it is really intended as an upstream distribution for FlexJS. I'm reasonably sure people may use Flacon for stuff other than FlexJS eg as a replacement for the current mxml/compc compilers. > IMO, this kit is successful when its build script runs successfully Even if it has failures along the way and still reports success? Currently it a little hard to work out what success is ie are Java errors OK or failing tests OK? Thanks, Justin
