Hi, testing the new Installer I got an exception when tried to install the 4.13.0 RC2 FDK but doesn’t happened when installing 4.12.1 ...
Process: Apache Flex SDK Installer [5570] Path: /Applications/Apache Flex/Apache Flex SDK Installer.app/Contents/MacOS/Apache Flex SDK Installer Identifier: org.apache.flex.installapacheflex Version: 3.1.0 (???) Code Type: X86 (Native) Parent Process: launchd [277] Responsible: Apache Flex SDK Installer [5570] User ID: 501 Date/Time: 2014-06-30 12:43:37.045 +0200 OS Version: Mac OS X 10.9.3 (13D65) Report Version: 11 Anonymous UUID: 74662061-F9E9-E13F-709F-F0DD028953BA Crashed Thread: 9 com.apple.NSURLConnectionLoader Exception Type: EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT) Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000 Application Specific Information: terminating with uncaught exception of type Security::UnixError: UNIX error exception abort() called anybody knows something about that? ______________________ Jose Barragan Senior Software Engineer Codeoscopic +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com On 30 Jun 2014, at 09:04, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Would the vote be consensus? If so, it is guaranteed to lose. > If the vote is majority and loses, does that prevent me from using the > script? Or sharing with others via some other place other than the repo? > > I guess I don't see how we can legislate against individuals using scripts. > But I do agree that we don't want to keep arguing this topic. > > -Alex > ________________________________________ > From: omup...@gmail.com [omup...@gmail.com] on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala > [bigosma...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:08 PM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3 > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Again, this script does not decide on the correctness of the >> LICENSE/NOTICE, so every time some one or the same person runs it, there is >> the same chance they will catch an error as if they had typed the >> command-line commands themselves. The script does not vote for you, it is >> only intended to increase your efficiency and accuracy in deciding how to >> vote. And yes, nobody has to use it. >> >> > Let us vote on this verification scripts and formalize it, please. We > don't want to argue this point during every RC. > > Thanks, > Om > > >> -Alex >> ________________________________________ >> From: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com] >> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 5:39 PM >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3 >> >> HI, >> >>> The approval scripts attempt to get you to vote with less hassle. >> >> Again to make clear a script is in no way a replacement for voting. Don't >> get me wrong it's very useful as a basic check and hopefully that will mean >> people will vote more. But put it this way, running the script 1000 times >> on a RC by one person or once by 1000 people gives the same results. Would >> the second really be worth 1000 +1 votes? Do we really think that a script >> == due diligence?
