On 8/26/2014 1:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Thanks Jeffry,
One followup question: My understanding is that a contractor "must" have
the option of doing non-client work.
As lubricious as it sounds; a lot of contracts I am provided by
employers [bu default] they own everything I do regardless of whether it
is done for them or not. I, personally, have never signed a contract
like that. And I cannot imagine a company trying to enforce such a
thing on a contractor.
The whole thing boggles my mind.
If that's true, if you found an SDK
bug while working for a client, would you "stop the clock", fix the bug,
then "start the clock" again?
I would try to get approval for the client to pay for the bug fix.
:-) But, in lieu of that I'd stop the clock.
If
the fix is owned by the client, the client may need to give permission for
the fix to be contributed to Apache.
Agreed!
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
203-379-0773
