As we noticed with FlexUnit that simply releasing Maven artifacts of a previously released library isn't that easy (From Apache procedures ... the releasing itself is easy), I think we should think about releasing the maven artifacts together with the normal release.
Chris ________________________________________ Von: omup...@gmail.com <omup...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. August 2014 09:55 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0 MD5 and signature looks good. Compiles fine I see some issues: 1. There are two README files, one here [1] and one under the 'main' directory after unzipping the src/binary kit. We should merge those two, to avoid confusion. 2. LICENSE file is incomplete (there is a TODO section in there) 3. I still see the 'Adobe' name in package names, ex. SpellingUI/src/com/adobe ... I thought this was fixed? Was the RC made before this fix? 4. The genTextWordlist.sh script under main/Data does not work. Throws this error: $ ./genTextWordlist.sh cat: squigglyWordlist/*: No such file or directory 5. The apps under main/Demo/ does not seem to work Thanks, Om [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/README On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > When I was prepping the donation, I was thinking we'd send folks to > Hunspell to get their dictionaries. We could provide links, or maybe the > ant script can offer to fetch one (with notification of license > differences first). > > BTW, I ran out of time tonight to look at the RC. I'll look in my morning > and should have info by the time I normally see your first emails. > > -Alex > > On 8/27/14 9:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >While not a blocker, the main inconvenience I see with the current RC is > >that is requirement the user to source a dictionary, as none were > >provided in Adobe's donation. While it easy enough to take one from > >Adobe's version of Squiggly that's not exactly optimal. What can we do > >about this? Obvious at the very least we need to add it to the > >README/RELEASE_NOTES > > > >Does anyone know what Open Office does? I think they use (perhaps use to > >use?) the same dictionary format. > > > >Thanks, > >Justin > >
