The files in spelling.framework.ui seem to be new versions of the same files in spelling.ui?
-----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: 06 September 2014 05:52 To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Squiggly not working On 9/5/14 6:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I took a closer look and this may be an issue - a few of the Squiggly >code swcs are smaller than the Adobe ones. > >The Adobe download doesn't include code so it's a bit hard to tell what >may be missing. Alex were any source files omitted from the >ActionScript directories the donation or not checked in from Adobe? I did a little digging. It looks like the main/build.xml is not set up to reproduce the Adobe swcs. IIRC, Squiggly was in beta and undergoing active development for a while after the Adobe bits were posted, so it might be that they were playing around with their packaging and we got something that wasn't meant to be the same. There appears to be one thing that almost has to be a bug, and that is what the OP found, but the rest of the differences may just be different packaging. IMO, the bug is that the SpellingUIEx build makes SpellingUI an external lib, and the problem is that there is a SpellUI in each library. The Adobe version of SpellingUIEx also appears to have classes from AdobeLinguistics duplicated inside the SWC, but the build script says that ApacheFlexLinguisticUtils is external, so either some classes in com.adobe.linguistics shouldn't be in ApacheFlexLinguisticUtils or ApacheFlexLinguisticUtils shouldn't be external. I didn't see any files in my main that isn't in Git so I don't think we're seeing that problem this time. I think the build script needs at least that one tweak. -Alex
