On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > Are you referring to this post? [1] > > Yes. > > > The poster just thought that non-binding meant he voted against the > > release, not whether his vote counted or not. > > My reading of that post was that he assumed his +1 counted and was > surprised when it didn't and was saying "but I voted for it why doesn't my > vote count". It was sorted quickly but still something to consider. > You interpreted it wrong. That voter thought non-binding meant a -1 vote. Please read that email carefully. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > Justin
