Hi Justin,

thanks for looking into this. I'll go through your comments one by one:
- I tagged the release RC1 cause it was the RC1 and I remember having trouble 
deleting and re-adding a tag. If it's not a problem to delete a tag, I'd be 
glad to change this.
- Do you suggest to call the artifacts "apache-flex-messageing-{module}"? What 
do the others think about this? How about changing that to from 
"flex-messaging" to "apache-blazeds"?
- Didn't Alex change this to 20XX-2015? Gee ... just saw this was only on the 
NOTICE in the root ... not the modules directory :-(
- I removed the part about the bugfixes in the Readme, as not a single real 
bugfix was applied since the donation. What happened before that ... I don't 
know.
- Adjusted the README to no longer reference the modules directory
- Found another problem in the README in which I referenced the "Flex Tool API" 
instead of "Apache BlazeDS" ... fixed that too.

I'll wait another day till I spin up another RC assuming that your +0 will 
become a +1 as soon as these things are addressed and I want to give others a 
chance to find more stuff.

Chris



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] 
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. März 2015 08:13
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [BlazeDS] Release of Apache BlazeDS 4.7.0.0 RC1

Hi,

One thing I did noticed about the code is the large number of @author tags. 
This is generally frowned on in Apache. [1][2] Should we remove them?

Thanks,
Justin

1. 
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2004/board_minutes_2004_09_22.txt
 (read 7F)
2 http://opensource.com/law/14/2/copyright-statements-source-files

Reply via email to