In my experience, I have seen a lot of them. I don't know if there is a way to get an accurate count of how many.
Of course, if you are not able to locate them, we would have to go update them anyways. But, if you are able to locate and copy them over, it will definitely save us a lot of time. Thanks, Om On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Unless there are a lot of them, it will probably take less time to replace > the data with local .xml files. Some of this stuff was created and > maintained by individuals and had no corporate backup. > > -Alex > > On 4/27/15, 2:47 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Also, it looks like a lot of the running swf files load example content > >from this server: > >http://aspexamples.adobe.com > > > >Ex: click on the "View Running Example" button in the bottom on this page: > > > http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf6568 > >f-7ffc.html > > > >The swf file loads, tries to load something from > >http://aspexamples.adobe.com/chart_examples/expenses.aspx but fails > >silently. > > > >It would be great if we get the contents of that server as well. Although > >we might need an ASP.net server to run this content, we may be at least > >able to reuse the content. > > > >Thanks, > >Om > > > >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> Infra confirmed that only trunk gets pub’d and I test I ran also seems > >>to > >> prove that. I’ve put the files in the flexdocs branch > >> (site/branches/flexdocs). > >> > >> After the .html files were signed off, someone on our docs team found a > >> folder of .mxml files that are supposedly the examples used in the .html > >> files. There seem to be more mxml files in this folder than there are > >> examples listed in the .html files so I’m not quite sure if these are > >>the > >> right files yet or not. > >> > >> My current thinking is that if a sampling of these files match up > >>against > >> the .html, I’ll put the files that I know are mentioned in the .html > >>files > >> into some repo somewhere (also SVN or flex-examples?). If I try to > >>commit > >> the whole folder it would need a whole donation process again. Since we > >> were going to extract the MXML from the HTML if we didn’t find this > >> folder, I can argue that the results are the same as doing so, but only > >> for the ones I can prove match up. > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 4/27/15, 12:24 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> wrote: > >> > >> >You are correct. That would be the best way to go. > >> > > >> >-Nick > >> > > >> >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> It just occurred to me: I can create a branch in SVN right? Only > >>trunk > >> >> gets pub’d? > >> >> > >> >> -Alex > >> >> > >> >> On 4/27/15, 4:48 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> > >>wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >I've got a window to work on it later this week. I had a project > >>get > >> >>put > >> >> >on hold so I'm pretty free Wednesday through Friday. > >> >> > > >> >> >I don't think there is a good way to stop a single folder from being > >> >> >published. I think if it's in the SVN, it's in. I want to open up > >>a > >> >> >ticket with INFRA to see if we can get a Lucene instance going so we > >> >>can > >> >> >actually search our docs/site as well. The more we keep adding, the > >> >>more > >> >> >complex it is to find stuff :) > >> >> > > >> >> >-Nick > >> >> > > >> >> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > >>wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Is there a good way to keep a folder from being published? What > >> >>folder > >> >> >> should be put it in? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> BTW, over on general@, Justin is expressing a concern about the > >> >>wording > >> >> >>of > >> >> >> the trademark attributions. I’m not sure I understand his > >>concern, > >> >>but > >> >> >>I > >> >> >> guess I’ll hold off on the commit for a few more days unless you > >> >>have a > >> >> >> window to work on it now. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -Alex > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 4/24/15, 4:54 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> > >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >I think it should go into the SVN, because ultimately that is > >>where > >> >>it > >> >> >> >will > >> >> >> >end up. But we will need to do some fixing up before we push it > >> >> >>live... > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >-Nick > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> This finally got officially recorded and reviewed by Apache. > >>I’m > >> >> >>ready > >> >> >> >>to > >> >> >> >> commit it to a repo, but which one? I was going to use > >> >> >>flex-utilities, > >> >> >> >> but maybe it should go in a folder on our web site SVN? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> BTW, Justin found in the IP review that there are a few other > >> >> >>trademark > >> >> >> >> names used in lists of products and fonts that we should > >>change to > >> >> >> >> something else, which I will do right after committing the > >> >> >>originals. So > >> >> >> >> the text will not exactly match what is on the Adobe site. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -Alex > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On 4/15/15, 9:27 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >Vote passed with: > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >11 +1 binding votes > >> >> >> >> > 2 +1 non-binding votes > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >After a few mixups, the Software Grant was finally recorded > >>so we > >> >> >>can > >> >> >> >> >start on the IP clearance. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >-Alex > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >On 3/16/15, 3:32 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <t...@extravision.com> > >>wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >>+1 > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >>On 13/03/15 19:58, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>> Looks like the process documents want an actual VOTE > >>thread, > >> >>so > >> >> >> >>here it > >> >> >> >> >>>is: > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> Please vote to accept the Adobe donation of most of the > >> >>content > >> >> >> >>found > >> >> >> >> >>>here > >> >> >> >> >>> [1]. Some images will be removed as well as the Adobe > >>stuff > >> >>you > >> >> >>see > >> >> >> >> >>> around the edges of the screen, but essentially, the text > >> >>content > >> >> >> >>will > >> >> >> >> >>>be > >> >> >> >> >>> donated. > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> I saw that the Adobe VP signed off today so now the Adobe > >> >>admins > >> >> >> >>will > >> >> >> >> >>>send > >> >> >> >> >>> the forms to the Apache Secretary who will record it and > >>then > >> >>we > >> >> >>can > >> >> >> >> >>>start > >> >> >> >> >>> the IP Clearance process. > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> Here’s my +1. > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> -Alex > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> [1] http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/index.html > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> > >>>>>>_____________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>>_ > >> >> >> >> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email > >> >>Security.cloud > >> >> >> >> >>>service. > >> >> >> >> >>> For more information please visit > >> http://www.symanteccloud.com > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> > >>>>>>_____________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>>_ > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
