Alex, I will state again, I am a compiler dev not a javascript dev but I did do POC of an AMD emitter and it's still in the repo. So if I did AMD in a couple weeks which I think it was, something else like RequireJS would be that hard.
I still think since it seems the compiler is getting a rebirth this year, we really need to make sure things can be changed or offer options. I'm going to spend the rest of the day in the compiler code, so I have more perspective. So, I am starting the emitter just to look at a more granular class composition structure. Mike On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 5/28/15, 10:56 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Not sure if there is better for UI Events but for the rest I came across > >this article [1], that's a long time it has been written, I don't know if > >it is still valid ? > > > > > http://webreflection.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/5-reasons-to-avoid-closure-com > >piler-in.html > > I think GCC does handle ES5. And there is still active development on it. > I’m definitely not a fan of their replacement of @expose with string > literals, but is there some other minifier we want to use instead? > > -Alex > > >
