Ok so I implemented the new option ... could you please give that a try? @Alex could you check if Adobe is legally ok with the way I implemented it, @Others ... could you check that this option suits your needs?
Another thing I would want to change before releasing ... currently the thing is called flex-maven-extension ... but I would like to change this to "flex-auto-installer-extension" or something similar as I'm going to start working on a real maven extension which tells Maven how to resolve the special types of scopes we have in Flex and I would like to call that "flex-maven-extension". What do you think? Chris ________________________________________ Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2015 23:18 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Another option for auto-acknowledging the Adobe download on CI servers? Yesssss!!!!! I'll try to implement this as soon as possible. Eventually this weekend, eventually next week :-) Thanks :-) Chris ________________________________________ Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com <carlos.rov...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2015 19:10 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Another option for auto-acknowledging the Adobe download on CI servers? I think is right. We as the "tech part" should try to suggest things like this so all legal stuff will not affect what we are trying to accomplish, since things like this could be a stone above us (in certain stuff like the one we are discussing about maven) Thanks Alex 2015-06-04 18:42 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > > > On 6/4/15, 9:15 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > > >But isn't the "auto-accept" sort of equivalent to typing "y" ... both are > >options of accepting, aren't they? > > > >If you run a build and type "no", the build will fail. If you start it > >again and type "yes" it will continue. So explicitly settings up > >"auto-accepting" for me is equivalent to typing "yes" or am I misguided > >here? > > Ah, I see now. I guess the term ‘auto-accept’ didn’t really have enough > meaning for me. I kept seeing it as a way to avoid the question in the > first place. > > Seems like this idea is worth a try. At some point some Adobe legal > person might want to see it in action and have other suggestions, but > hopefully they will find it acceptable as well. It sounds like there is > other documentation being referred to. In that documentation, can we > emphasize that by using the SystemId they are accepting the terms and > conditions? > > Thanks for being patient with me. > > -Alex > > -- Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Tres Creus, nº 104, 2-1, 08202 de Sabadell (Barcelona) con la documentación necesaria.
